Moral Accountancy and Moral Worth
1997
Metaphilosophy
People do good or bad things and get or do not get good or bad credit for their actions, depending (in part) on knowledge of their actions. I attempt to unfold some of the interconnections between these matters and between them and the achievement of moral worth. The main conclusion is that the heights of moral worth seem to appear in the oddest places.
"Moral Accountancy and Moral Worth", Metaphilosophy 28 (1997 ): 123-134.
Methodological Cynicism in Ethics
1994
International Journal of Applied Philosophy
Cynicism has a bad reputation. The cynic is not only after teaching us something new about morality, but seeks to unmask it, claiming that it derives from illicit and undeclared motivations. I explore whether there is anything we can learn from cynicism about morality, particularly about the content of morality. I distinguish between three basic forms of skepticism and the parallel forms of cynicism. I then examine four examples of suggestive ethical cynicism. Finally, I try to see in which areas ethical cynicism is likely to be more enlightening.
"Methodological Cynicism in Ethics", International Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1994 ): 53-58.
The Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism
1994
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Hard determinism is commonly thought to have grave moral consequences. Without attempting to fully deny this, I explore a previously unnoticed apparent ethical advantage of a belief in hard determinism. The lack of concern with personal desert which accompanies belief in hard determinism seems to make possible a form of purer morality' than ordinary morality. In the process I briefly consider some perplexities of Kantianism, the personal' difficulty of being a hard determinist, and the question as to whether non- utilitarian ethical considerations are possible with hard determinist premises.
"The Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1994 ): 355-363.
Did James Deceive Himself about Free Will?
1992
Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society
I argue that William James indulged in self-deception with regard to the free will problem. My argument differs from previous ones in two ways: firstly, in pointing out specific features of James's philosophical writing with indicate the self-deception. Secondly, in presenting an integrated case, based not only on the much discussed issue of his "Will to Believe" position, but on James's autobiographical writing as well as on specific features of his philosophical writing. The conclusion is said to cast doubts about the "Will to Believe" position. Finally, I briefly consider the general issue of philosophical self-deception.
"Did James Deceive Himself about Free Will?", Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society 28 (1992 ): 767-779.
The Good, the Bad, and the Nonidentity Problem: Reflections on Jewish History
0
Jewish Philosophy in an Analytic Age
TBA
"The Good, the Bad, and the Nonidentity Problem: Reflections on Jewish History", in Jewish Philosophy in an Analytic Age, Sam Lebens, Dani Rabinowitz and Aaron Segal, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
- 3עמוד 3